Study finds 1 in 3 people have a microchip implanted, most likely in their tooth fillings

UPDATE – I have heard that this is a fraudulent study. I would like to call the institute and if I find more information, I will post it. For now, I’ll just leave this here so those of you who happen upon the study will know that it is potentially untrue. Thanks.

* * *

Targeted Individuals have long claimed to have been forcibly implanted with an RFID chip. One TI told me to get the 16-digit identification number. Great, but how would I go about doing that?? If (when) I find out, I will share it here. It certainly explains how folks know what I’m doing – to the second – on a 24/7 basis. (How does my neighbor know when to leave the same time I do? How do they plan the directed conversations? How do police cross my path at such strategic points?). So many questions…and little by little, the answers will come. I don’t know how long it will take or if I will ever find out the answers. Evil has always been a mystery to me…this is by far the most evil I’ve personally witnessed. You would think after reading about atrocities, society would have learned from them, not learned to reinvent them.

Analysis of RFID chip prevalence in 3 discrete US populations


Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) Chips have been used extensively in wildlife ecology and conservation to identify and track individual specimens in a population. It has been unknown, however, how often RFID chips have been implanted in human populations for the tracking and identification of individuals. This study analyzed the prevalence of RFID Chips in 3 geographically discrete populations and found that, on average, 1 in 3 individuals carried an RFID Chip. Interestingly, there was a strong correlation with RFID Chip presence and previous dental work. – See more at:

and –

Population Midwest (MW) contained 958 individuals from Illinois, Iowa, and Wisconsin. Population Northeast (NE) contained 987 individuals from Maine, Rhode Island, and New Jersey. Population South West (SW) contained 1,010 individuals from Arizona and Nevada. Volunteers were recruited using standard methods and compensated in a manner consistent with industry standards. All test subjects were treated in compliance with institutional codes of ethics and standards. – See more at:



Our work has shown that approximately 1 in 3 individuals in the United States is carrying an RFID microchip. Our sample size was sufficiently large (n=2955) and was spread throughout three distinct geographic regions. Thus, we are comfortable extrapolating our finding to the broader American population.

Intriguingly, the most frequently identified location for an RFID microchip was in tooth fillings. This is contrary to popularly held belief that RFID chips are inserted in the dorsal of the hand near the thumb. More investigation is required to understand the significance of this finding. – See more at:

There is no doubt collusion exists if “ethical” reports mention the exception to law enforcement…



Illusion of Justice – 2014 report

I found this report recently – it’s from 2014. It discusses the role the FBI and local law enforcement have played in terrorist-related crimes.

I have been under some type of surveillance by the police – I call them the FAUX-lice because ***real cops*** don’t behave this way.

Here’s a quote, and the source is below.

Indeed, in some cases the Federal Bureau of Investigation may have created terrorists out of law-abiding individuals by conducting sting operations that facilitated or invented the target’s willingness to act. According to multiple studies, nearly 50 percent of the more than 500 federal counterterrorism convictions resulted from informant-based cases; almost 30 percent of those cases were sting operations in which the informant played an active role in the underlying plot. In the case of the “Newburgh Four,” for example, a judge said the government “came up with the crime, provided the means, and removed all relevant obstacles,” and had, in the process, made a terrorist out of a man “whose buffoonery is positively Shakespearean in scope.”

Illusion of Justice July 21, 2014

Police Officer asks Yahoo Answers how many miles to follow a Targeted Individual !!!

This says it all….How can you be “lawful” when you are stalking and harassing somebody!!!!

Source: Yahoo Answers

How many miles do you follow a targeted individual?

I just want to be doing this by the books and be lawful about this. My team leader says we can follow a targeted individual for as many as five to ten miles. Is this accuarate? If not, please let me know. thanks!
Update: oops I meant accurate. sorry, I’m in heavy traffic.
2 answers

Center for Constitutional Rights – Know your rights with federal agencies

I’ve been browsing this website Center for Constitutional Rights and think others may be interested in it, too. Here is a brochure called

If an Agent Knocks

I just glanced over the brochure. It explains the rights of the FBI, NSA, etc. and the rights of citizens. Basically, as most of us have learned (the hard way), these federal agencies have a lot of leeway when it comes to surveillance, intimidation, and harassment. However, I think you’ll find the organization and its resources helpful.

What is anchoring or what are anchors or triggers?

Anchoring first occurred to me at work and it confused me – why were all these co-workers using the same words? I would call them triggers for lack of a better term (or understanding).

Here are some of the words/terms that have been used on me to anchor negative thoughts/feelings –

  • frustrating
  • reciprocal
  • crazy
  • chiming in

Here are some of the sounds –

  • door slamming
  • dog barking
  • sirens

I’ve since learned that this is a technique in mobbing and community-based harassment. The perps use a word repeatedly to trigger a negative response. So when I felt confused, frightened, annoyed or stressed (all of the above!) that people kept using the term ‘crazy’ (one person said it over 25 times in one day), the feeling associated with the word got stuck in my brain to react stressed. So even when I hear it said naturally, by non-perps, I could still get the little electric shock of stress pulsing through my body. It can become like a shock somebody controls remotely and on auto-pilot. The perps just have to get it started, the rest will take care of itself. I suppose that’s why the words or terms change every so often.

I’ve tried to overcome it myself by using a technique I call “take back the word” – which stems from my knowledge of the “Take Back the Night” activism on college campuses to protest sexual assault. In this way, I use the word myself repeatedly. I think of it as fighting back and try to associate feelings of strength with it.

I also just Googled it and found this site –

How to remove an anchor

If you have some bad anchors that you want to get rid of, its still possible, for example if you feel bad whenever you workout you can easily remove that anchor, removing an anchor can simply be done by repeating one of the events alone without the other event being prevented by time, your subconscious mind will separate both events and so the anchor will be removed. Source:

I’m sure there are better explanations, but in the meantime, I’ll post this and keep researching.

Hang in there, peeps!

I now understand that people used these terms to trigger a response in me.


With organized group stalking there is no escape. It is a full court press seeking to destroy the targeted individual’s life. It is identical to COINTELPRO and all facets of the targets life are turned hostile to them. This is the creation of a hostile living environment. Infiltration of family, work, friends, associates, and, just about every aspect of the target’s life is manipulated using advanced behavioral science. It is inconceivable that anyone with a more than cursory knowledge of COINTELPRO could believe that these similarities could be attributed to anything but the involvement of the FBI.



Woman, Interrupted

This is my life – do I choose to be with the mentally insane and not fit into their world, or deal with “reality” in the “real world” which has become unreal due to revenge stalking…

From Wikipedia –

…the Stasi often used a method which was really diabolic. It was called Zersetzung, and it’s described in another guideline. The word is difficult to translate because it means originally “biodegradation”. But actually, it’s a quite accurate description. The goal was to destroy secretly the self-confidence of people, for example by damaging their reputation, by organizing failures in their work, and by destroying their personal relationships. Considering this, East Germany was a very modern dictatorship. The Stasi didn’t try to arrest every dissident. It preferred to paralyze them, and it could do so because it had access to so much personal information and to so many institutions.

—Hubertus Knabe, German historian [28]