UPDATE – I have heard that this is a fraudulent study. I would like to call the institute and if I find more information, I will post it. For now, I’ll just leave this here so those of you who happen upon the study will know that it is potentially untrue. Thanks.
* * *
Targeted Individuals have long claimed to have been forcibly implanted with an RFID chip. One TI told me to get the 16-digit identification number. Great, but how would I go about doing that?? If (when) I find out, I will share it here. It certainly explains how folks know what I’m doing – to the second – on a 24/7 basis. (How does my neighbor know when to leave the same time I do? How do they plan the directed conversations? How do police cross my path at such strategic points?). So many questions…and little by little, the answers will come. I don’t know how long it will take or if I will ever find out the answers. Evil has always been a mystery to me…this is by far the most evil I’ve personally witnessed. You would think after reading about atrocities, society would have learned from them, not learned to reinvent them.
Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) Chips have been used extensively in wildlife ecology and conservation to identify and track individual specimens in a population. It has been unknown, however, how often RFID chips have been implanted in human populations for the tracking and identification of individuals. This study analyzed the prevalence of RFID Chips in 3 geographically discrete populations and found that, on average, 1 in 3 individuals carried an RFID Chip. Interestingly, there was a strong correlation with RFID Chip presence and previous dental work. – See more at: http://witscience.org/analysis-of-radio-frequency-identification-rfid-chip-prevalence-in-3-discrete-united-states-populations/#sthash.E3TXpQxA.dpuf
Population Midwest (MW) contained 958 individuals from Illinois, Iowa, and Wisconsin. Population Northeast (NE) contained 987 individuals from Maine, Rhode Island, and New Jersey. Population South West (SW) contained 1,010 individuals from Arizona and Nevada. Volunteers were recruited using standard methods and compensated in a manner consistent with industry standards. All test subjects were treated in compliance with institutional codes of ethics and standards. – See more at: http://witscience.org/analysis-of-radio-frequency-identification-rfid-chip-prevalence-in-3-discrete-united-states-populations/#sthash.E3TXpQxA.dpuf
Our work has shown that approximately 1 in 3 individuals in the United States is carrying an RFID microchip. Our sample size was sufficiently large (n=2955) and was spread throughout three distinct geographic regions. Thus, we are comfortable extrapolating our finding to the broader American population.
Intriguingly, the most frequently identified location for an RFID microchip was in tooth fillings. This is contrary to popularly held belief that RFID chips are inserted in the dorsal of the hand near the thumb. More investigation is required to understand the significance of this finding. – See more at: http://witscience.org/analysis-of-radio-frequency-identification-rfid-chip-prevalence-in-3-discrete-united-states-populations/#sthash.E3TXpQxA.dpuf
There is no doubt collusion exists if “ethical” reports mention the exception to law enforcement…